Transportation Brief: Illinois Supreme Court Ruling Sparks Increase in Biometric Privacy Litigation

by Chip Andrewscavage, Andrew J. Butcher

March 28, 2019

As the use of biometric identifiers for timekeeping, handheld devices, and security grows, so does state regulation and litigation. Illinois, Washington, and Texas are examples of states that regulate the collection, use, and retention of biometric identifiers such as fingerprints, voiceprint, eye retinas, iris scans, full hand, or facial geometry scans. A recent Illinois Supreme Court ruling and the subsequent flood of litigation regarding compliance with Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) highlights the urgent need to review biometric compliance protocol. 

BIPA requires companies to develop a written retention and destruction policy related to biometric information and make the policy available to the public. Companies must also make written disclosures and obtain authorization from an individual before collecting biometric data. 

BIPA was enacted in 2008, and a renewed interest in BIPA lawsuits followed a 2019 decision from the Illinois Supreme Court in Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. The Court held a plaintiff does not need to show actual injury to recover statutory damages under BIPA.  Rather, mere procedural violations of the statute, such as the failure to obtain written authorization or to publicly post a retention policy, were sufficient to support damages.   Any procedural violation provides the “aggrieved” individual with a private right of action to recover liquidated damages of $1,000 for each negligent violation and $5,000 for each reckless violation of BIPA, along with reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 
 
Companies can reduce potential exposure by implementing the following:

• Ensure proper retention and destruction policies are in place and publicly available.
• Ensure all biometric information destruction policies comply with the applicable timelines set forth in the statute.
• Ensure all notice and authorization forms are distributed before biometric identifiers are collected or disseminated to third-parties.

Early investment in proper biometric identifier notifications, authorizations, policies, and procedures may save time and money in the long run.

Scopelitis’ Transportation Brief® is intended as a report to our clients and friends on developments affecting the transportation industry. The published material does not constitute an exhaustive legal study and should not be regarded or relied upon as individual legal advice or opinion.

• Transportation Brief: Federal Courts Split on Applicability of Federal Preemption in Negligent Hiring Claims
  by Thomas E. Schulte
  
  In Autumn 2018, the Firm analyzed two federal court decisions that held the FAAA preempted the plaintiffs’ negligent selection claims against a broker. Since then, three additional federal district courts have addressed this issue as the law surrounding broker liability continues to develop.
• Transportation Brief: Transporting Hemp Still Risky Business After 2018 Farm Bill
  by Nathaniel G. Saylor
  
  The 2018 Farm Bill (the Bill) removed hemp and hemp-derived products—provided they contain a THC concentration of 0.3% or less—from the Controlled Substances Act’s definition of marijuana, effectively decriminalizing the transportation of those products at the federal level. But, as some carriers and their drivers have learned, states can prohibit transportation of hemp and related products within their borders.
• Transportation Brief: Supreme Court Weighs in on Arbitration with Owner-Operators
  by Braden K. Core , Prasad Sharma
  
  At issue in New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, decided on January 15, 2019, was whether Mr. Oliveira—who personally drove a lease-purchase truck—was exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) because he had a “contract of employment.” The answer would determine whether Prime could invoke the FAA to enforce an arbitration agreement Mr. Oliveira had agreed to.
• Transportation Brief: Canada’s New Federal Fuel Tax
  by Ronald J. Morelock
  
  The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) now administers a federal fuel tax that is part of the Canadian government’s plan to reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions in Canada. Failure to timely register or pay the fuel charge may result in penalties and interest.  
• Transportation Brief: Spotlight on Scopelitis Emerging Tech Practice
  Shannon M. Cohen , Gregory M. Feary , Andrew K. Light , Nathaniel G. Saylor
  
  The way transportation companies conduct business today is changing quicker than ever, with technology presenting new opportunities and challenges. The Scopelitis Firm actively follows these changes and frequently assists newly-formed, technology-based transportation companies and established companies that seek to adopt new technologies to enhance their existing business model. 
• On the Road
  Scopelitis attorneys are often invited to participate in meetings with transportation industry leaders. Learn more about their trips this quarter.
• Dispatches
  Transportation Industry News & Trends