Transportation Brief: Labor Meets Transportation in Surface Transportation Reauthorization Bills
August 25, 2021
After a one-year extension last fall, Congress is making progress, albeit in fits and starts, towards passing a multiyear surface transportation reauthorization bill. Both versions of these massive bills not only authorize highway spending, but also contain numerous policy-related provisions aimed at trucking.
At the time of this writing, the full House has passed its version of policy-related provisions (H.R. 3684) and the Senate has passed its version, known as the bipartisan infrastructure bill. The Senate provisions will now have to go to the House to reconcile the differences between the two versions. While the future of the legislation and the final provisions are uncertain, now is a good time to look at what may be coming down the road.
Carriers utilizing lease-purchase agreements may be wary of provisions in both bills that direct the Secretary of Transportation, in conjunction with the Secretary of Labor, to establish a Truck Leasing Task Force to examine truck leasing agreements, including lease-purchase agreements, and whether their terms are “predatory” (House) or “inequitable” (Senate). The House version specifically directs an examination of the classification of drivers under lease-purchase agreements, while the Senate version places more emphasis on how the terms affect maintenance and safe operation of vehicles. Ultimately, the Task Force is to issue a report with its findings and include recommendations on best practices and changes to laws at the federal, state, or local levels to promote “fair leasing agreements” that allow drivers to “earn a living wage.” Because provisions are in both bills – although not identical – some form is likely to become law.
Perpetuating the novel intersection of labor and transportation, the House version requires consideration of an applicant’s compliance with “applicable labor and employment laws and regulations, including wage and hour and workplace safety laws and regulations, relevant to the safe operation of a motor carrier” when granting or denying motor carrier authority. Another House provision would direct a rulemaking to establish limits on the amount of time a driver can be detained without the driver being compensated for such detention.
In a measure supported by some in the industry but opposed by many, the House version would increase the minimum liability insurance amounts from $750,000 to $2 million and provides for automatic inflation adjustments every five years thereafter. On the positive side, there is a Senate provision that directs the establishment of a pilot apprenticeship program under which drivers aged between 18 and 21 could engage in interstate operations.
The highway bill is critical to the trucking industry. Congressional deliberations throughout the remainder of the summer and fall hope to produce a necessary bill – whichever policy provisions make the final cut.
Transportation Brief: Ninth Circuit Addresses Piece-rate Pay Plans
by James H. Hanson , E. Ashley PaynterIn Ayala v. U.S. Xpress, Inc., the Ninth Circuit recently ruled that a properly drafted piece-rate compensation pay plan that pays for delivered loads can cover both the time spent driving as well as the time spent performing non-driving activities associated with delivering the loads. How can companies address how drivers earn their activity-based pay?
Transportation Brief: Collections During COVID and Beyond – Protecting Your Warehouse
by Kevin M. Phillips , Michael D. ReedDuring the height of the pandemic, businesses, including warehouses, were presented with a new world of challenges. One such challenge present before and during the pandemic is collections. The good news is that warehouses can take certain actions to be better positioned to handle this age-old problem.
Transportation Brief: Questions Remain After Change in Export Air Cargo Rules
by Tyler P. Biddle , Braden K. Core , Nathaniel G. SaylorIn the Spring 2021 edition of The Transportation Brief, we advised on an upcoming change to the rules governing cargo offered for international air transportation. The new rule, effective June 30, 2021, requires all cargo to be screened or handled pursuant to an “alternative framework.” This has caused significant disruption in the supply chain as shippers, air forwarders, and all-cargo aircraft operators attempt to navigate new compliance obligations. Read more about these difficulties and how to stay ahead of the curve.
Transportation Brief: New Texas Law Paving the Way to Curbing Nuclear Verdicts
by Renea E. Hooper , Peter C. MortonWith “runaway” jury verdicts in trucking accident cases on the rise in recent years, a new law may give trucking companies some relief in one major venue.
Transportation Brief: Spotlight on Investigations and Audits
Kelli M. Block , Braden K. Core , Gregory M. Feary , A. Jack Finklea , James H. Hanson , Christopher C. McNatt , Steven A. Pletcher , David D. Robinson , Nathaniel G. Saylor , Rebecca S. TrennerWhile the transportation industry is largely deregulated, a surprising number of federal, state, and local government agencies write and administer a long—and growing—list of rules affecting transportation providers. These agencies regularly inspect for noncompliance, and they have the power to assess civil penalties for violations, place assets “out of service,” or worse. When the inspectors come calling, it is important to be prepared.
- On the Road
Scopelitis attorneys are often invited to participate in meetings with transportation industry leaders. Learn more about their trips this quarter.
Transportation Industry News & Trends